<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>original photographs Archives - Maureen Taylor</title>
	<atom:link href="https://maureentaylor.com/tag/original-photographs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link></link>
	<description>The Photo Detective</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2017 18:26:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">99869351</site>	<item>
		<title>Lost Pictures: Copies in the Family</title>
		<link>https://maureentaylor.com/lost-pictures-copies-in-the-family/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Maureen Taylor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 18:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Ask Maureen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photo Identification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[captions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Family photographs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[original photographs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photographic processes]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://maureentaylor.com/lost-pictures-copies-in-the-family/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>This summer my mother-in-law showed me a photograph that commemorated the 50th anniversary of her great-grandparents. She asked if I could have a look and compare it to another photo of a smaller family group. Could I match up any of the people in the two photos? I love a challenge so I said, &#8220;Of [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://maureentaylor.com/lost-pictures-copies-in-the-family/">Lost Pictures: Copies in the Family</a> appeared first on <a href="https://maureentaylor.com">Maureen Taylor</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_CK_9kuMijss/Sqf5tmUNsWI/AAAAAAAAAH4/OWuMvn4ZaIQ/s1600-h/children091.jpg"><img decoding="async" style="margin: 0px auto 10px; display: block; text-align: center; cursor: pointer; width: 252px; height: 320px;" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5379542841692107106" alt="" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_CK_9kuMijss/Sqf5tmUNsWI/AAAAAAAAAH4/OWuMvn4ZaIQ/s320/children091.jpg" /></a></p>
<p>This summer my mother-in-law showed me a photograph that commemorated the 50th anniversary of her great-grandparents. She asked if I could have a look and compare it to another photo of a smaller family group. Could I match up any of the people in the two photos? I love a challenge so I said, &#8220;Of course!&#8221;</p>
<p>I turned over the first image and asked, &#8220;Who owns the original?&#8221; &#8220;I do, &#8221; she replied. Hmmm. If this photo was taken in the late 1890s, then it wasn&#8217;t possible for the image in my hands to be the original. It was a twentieth century resin coated picture with &#8220;Kodak&#8221; written on the back. It was a copy! Now she&#8217;s hoping to find a relative with the actual 1890s image. My fingers are crossed.</p>
<p>Her dilemma is unfortunately not unique. In every family photo collection are copies of much earlier images.</p>
<p>For instance, this photo postcard image is labeled &#8220;52 years ago.&#8221; The postcard dates from the early 1900s which means this tyke posed for a portrait in the mid-19th century. Unfortunately the person who wrote the caption didn&#8217;t include the child&#8217;s name.</p>
<p>Look closely at this photograph. You can see the scalloped edge of the mat that covered this image. The photograph&#8217;s shiny surface reflected light during the copying process. It&#8217;s clear that this is a copy of a daguerreotype, but where is the original?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m really intrigued by these &#8220;lost images.&#8221; It&#8217;s obvious that someone wanted to have another copy of a picture. Back before digital sharing technologies, the only way to &#8220;share&#8221; an image was to make another photographic copy.</p>
<p>So why care about the original? Looking at an original photo lets you feel a connection with the past. There are often identification details such as a photographer&#8217;s name or a caption on the back that are cut off in the copy. Tracking down the original provides you with a link to the owner &#8211; and more clues to help you solve the mystery!</p>
<p>Take a good look at the images in your family collection. What you think is an original, may not be. If you have a story about a &#8220;lost&#8221; original, send me a note.<br />
<!-- AddThis Button BEGIN --><br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.addthis.com/bookmark.php"><img decoding="async" alt="Bookmark and Share" src="http://s9.addthis.com/button1-addthis.gif" width="125" height="16" /></a><br />
<!-- AddThis Button END --></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://maureentaylor.com/lost-pictures-copies-in-the-family/">Lost Pictures: Copies in the Family</a> appeared first on <a href="https://maureentaylor.com">Maureen Taylor</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">3107</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
