Helmuth Voigt’s story in this blog and that argumentative caption about his life captivated a lot of readers. In that post, I outlined the photo clues in the image then presented what I found. Solving a photo mystery sometimes requires help so I asked for assistance solving the following questions:

• When and where did Helmuth marry Minnie/Mary Boyd? Could there be another marriage?
• What happened to Helmuth’s first wife Jennie? Were there any children?
• Where is the evidence for Helmuth’s businesses?
• Why is daughter Lillian stating her maiden name as Ehle?
• Why isn’t Helmuth in the 1900 U.S. Census?

Frankly, sometimes it takes another set of eyes to see what you’ve missed. With documents available on a variety of sites, overlooking the obvious happens.

Relationship Clues for Solving Photo Mysteries

Deborah Kline pointed out the relationship could be different than I thought. “It’s possible one of the writers, especially the top writer, was not a child of Helmuth Voight, but rather a daughter-in-law or son-in-law.  Some refer to their father-in-law as Dad, and like in this case, do so with the name.” She’s right. In family, we can refer to in-laws with terms we reserve for biological family. For instance, my husband calls my mother, “Mom.” She loves it.

A Missing Document

A big thank you to newsletter reader Annette Bowen for spotting a gap! She saw that I mentioned Helmuth’s naturalization in Waterbury, Connecticut in 1889. I found that on Ancestry.com but the actual naturalization papers aren’t on Ancestry.com only the indices. The full papers are on FamilySearch. She sent me a link to the exact document. You can view it here. (You’ll need a free FamilySearch account to see the document)¹

A man named Frank Ehle was a witness for the 23-year-old Helmuth’s naturalization. There was a note added to the bottom. “Known him for 7 years in the country and he was under 18 years.” Helmuth immigrated at 16 which means that Ehle knew him the whole time he was in this country. Now I’m wondering if Helmuth spent his early years here with Ehle in Waterbury, Connecticut. There is a gap between his immigration in 1882 and naturalization in 1889.

A quick search on Ancestry.com turns up two Frank Ehle’s in Waterbury. Father and son. The elder Frank, a German immigrant, was born in 1834, and his son, Frank E. Ehle, was born in 1873. It’s likely the elder Ehle witnessed the naturalization.

Anne’s addition to the story answered the question of why Lillian referred to herself with the surname Ehle.

Frank E Ehle married Minnie Boyd on September 2, 1903. They had a daughter Lillian, born May 24, 1905. Unfortunately Frank died June 20, 1906. These three events took place in Waterbury, Connecticut.²

In 1907 Helmuth Voigt appears in the Waterbury City Directory. In the 1910 Census, Helmuth and Minnie state they’ve been married for two years. Minnie’s husband Frank Ehle died in 1906 and according to the census data, it appears (if correct) that Helmuth and Minnie married in 1908. Unfortunately, they do not appear in the Connecticut marriage index.³

Many of the questions listed above persist but solving a photo mystery can take time and patience.

An Identification and a Few Answers

Elizabeth Ahlemann emailed me some surprising information about Helmuth and who else might be in the picture. Get ready. This is a big reveal.

In 1907, we know that Helmuth was employed at the Elton in Waterbury, Connecticut, but he boarded at 51 Wood St. Who else lived there? Turns out he was boarding with Christina Ehle, mother of the late Frank E Ehle and Minnie Boyd Ehle’s mother-in-law. ^4.

Genealogist Jennifer Zinck found Minnie and Helmuth’s marriage record for June 11, 1908 in Waterbury, Connecticut.

Let’s go back to the image. I mentioned it was taken circa 1900. In 1903 Helmuth was living in Brooklyn, New York at 1157 Fulton St. It was the Fulton Hotel and Cafe (which also had a bowling alley and shuffleboard courts0. The proprietor was George Bomermann and the manager was his son, George John Boemermann. Elizabeth found this by searching Newspapers.com. Also at the same address and owned by the same family was the Kaiser Haus hotel and restaurant and The Ormonde, a restaurant/banquet hall. ⁵

A Big Reveal

George Boemermann had a brother Henry who also owned a restaurant in Brooklyn. When he died, the newspaper ran a photo of him. Does he look familiar?

Elizabeth has a theory and it’s a good one. I surmised this photo might be a work image with members of the Boemermann family members and valued staff. I still wonder if it isn’t Helmuth on the far right. He was an employee. Perhaps the photo dates from 1903.

Now I’m looking for more information on the Boemermann’s to see if I can turn up other pictures of them. It’s possible. This photo mystery is full of twists and turns.

Endnotes

1. Connecticut Naturalization Records, 1795-1942,” database, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/3:1:3Q9M-C3SQ-Y9PL-N?cc=3238391 : 4 June 2020), > image 1 of 1; citing NARA microfilm publication M1299 (Boston, MA: National Archives and Records Administration, n.d.) https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/3:1:3Q9M-C3SQ-Y9PL-9?cc=3238391&personaUrl=%2Fark%3A%2F61903%2F1%3A1%3AC2YR-Z13Z
2. Connecticut State Department of Health; Hartford, CT; Connecticut Vital Records — Index of Marriages, 1897-1968 Vital Records — Index of Marriages, 1897-2001 https://www.ctatatelibrarydata.org/marriage-records/; Ancestry.com. U.S., Social Security Applications and Claims Index, 1936-2007 [database on-line]. Provo, UT, USA: Ancestry.com Operations, Inc., 2015; Ancestry.com. Connecticut, U.S., Deaths and Burials Index, 1650-1934 [database on-line]. Provo, UT, USA: Ancestry.com Operations, Inc., 2011.
3. MyHeritage.com, U.S. City Directories, Waterbury, Connecticut 1886-1889, 1906-1907..com. 1910 United States Federal Census [database on-line]. Lehi, UT, USA: Ancestry.com Operations Inc, 2006. Year: 1910; Census Place: Schenectady Ward 7, Schenectady, New York; Roll: T624_1078; Page: 6B; Enumeration District: 0199; FHL microfilm: 1375091
4. Ancestry, U.S. City Directories, 1822-1995, Waterbury Connecticut, 1907, p. 128 and 308.
5. Obituary of George Boemermann, The Standard Union (Brooklyn, New York), 2 December, 1909, p.2.

The post Solving a Photo Mystery With a Little Help appeared first on Maureen Taylor.

In Alice Quinn’s new book, The Rose Code, women (and a few men) work tirelessly to break German codes to further Great Britain’s World War II efforts. For them, it’s about recognizing the patterns. If you’ve ever tried to tease clues out of a photo then you can relate. Photo code-breaking consists of identifying not only people but objects and places. Get one wrong and the message/story is different.

In my last blog post, I wrote about the supposed Helmuth Voight image taken in Prospect Park, Brooklyn. The place is identifiable and easily researched, except for the building on the left. In the caption for that image, the building is a food concession. But in order to find out more and link Helmuth to it, I needed a name. Searching Google Images helped a bit. On one site a caption refers to the structure as a French restaurant while on another it’s called The Shelter.

Searching for the Right Word

Sometimes all it takes when researching an image is the correct name. That’s why on my reference shelf I keep a visual dictionary. It’s a dictionary of pictures and identifiers. While it’s handy to have around, it didn’t help me with this image.

Ebay.com is a great source when trying to find visuals. Beware though. Descriptions aren’t always accurate. If you’re looking for images of a specific place or family, you can set up an alert so you never miss out. My new YouTube video shows you how. In this case, I found a couple of postcards of interest, but nothing that provided new information.

I like to start with a visual search but publications in Google books supplied details on Prospect Park. When the pieces fall into place, it’s seems so obvious. The answer was there all the time.

In Frederick Law Olmstead’s papers, it’s called the Concert Grove House as opposed to the Concert Grove Pavilion next door. Designed by Vaux and Thomas Wisedell it opened in 1874. It was indeed a restaurant where individuals could have a light supper and refreshments while listening to a concert. It was torn down in 1949.¹

Do I know anything about Helmuth Voight running the concession in this building? Only what the caption said, but I’m not giving up.

Read the full story here

Sources

¹Censer, Jane Turner., Schuyler, David., Hoffman, Carolyn F.., Beveridge, Charles E.., Hawkins, Kenneth., Olmsted, Frederick Law., Shapiro, Michael., Gagel, Amanda., Ranney, Victoria Post., Carr, Ethan., McLaughlin, Charles Capen. The years of Olmsted, Vaux & Company, 1865-1874. United Kingdom: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1992. Books.Google.com p. 427.

The post Photo Code-Breaking appeared first on Maureen Taylor.

Photo captions can be short, incomplete, mysterious, or full of clues. It all depends on who’s writing it and when. The caption on this image is different.  It’s in two parts in a different script and the authors are arguing. When I saw this image sitting in a bin, I had to have it.  It’s the first time I’ve ever seen a caption quite like this.

We’ve been using this image to demonstrate the digital photo organizer MemoryWeb’s back/front photo linking feature. This is definitely a caption that we don’t want to lose and back/front linking means I don’t have to search for two separate images. They are together in my MemoryWeb account.

In my quest to find the truth behind the caption, I’ve fallen into research rabbit holes (as genealogists call them) and now know more about the subject of the caption than likely his living family did.

But I don’t know everything and that’s where I could use a little help.

Let’s start at the beginning. There are five basic clues present on/in the image—photographer’s name, a location, the identity of one caption writer, what they are wearing, and the father’s name.

The caption casts doubt on the father’s career. Was he a success or was he a failure?  That’s the big question.  

Photographer and Location

Henry Grimsehl of 229 Prospect Ave., near 5^th Ave, Brooklyn, N.Y.  took this group portrait in Prospect Park. That’s easy. The imprint is on the back and the place is recognizable.  He was a German immigrant who took pictures in New York City and later in Brooklyn. He was a photographer in Brooklyn from about 1892 at that address, and after 1902 at 299 Prospect. Grimsehl died in 1919.

The group posed in front of the Prospect Park Concert Grove Pavilion. It still stands and is undergoing restoration. The restaurant on the left-hand side of the image was demolished in 1946. It’s mentioned in the caption as proof of a man’s success and that’s where the story gets interesting.  

The Caption

I love that Edmund Voigt signed his caption. “Prospect Park Brooklyn where Dad held the restaurant and café concession.”  That part seems clear, right?  Not so fast. There is a person in a chef/cooking staff outfit standing in the center of the image. Edmund continues. “That might be Dad on right standing looks like him except the mouth.”

Above his statements is where the argument starts. An unnamed person, “Dad Helmuth Voigt was not a successful businessman. He would start a business, go broke then leave it. Never could save anything.”  Seems pretty apparent that there is no love lost between the writer and their father.  Below Edmund’s identification is “that is NOT Dad, no I’m afraid.”

From their caption, we know that both commenters are children of Helmuth and that one of them was Edmund. There’s no gray area in the disagreement.

Tracking Helmut

Finding Helmuth’s life story took time. Ancestry.com, MyHeritage.com, various newspaper databases, Ellis Island, FamilySearch.com, and Google. I now have a timeline of his life with gaps. You’ll see what I mean. Rather than research backward from his death, let’s build a timeline working forward. Dating photos often involves doing extensive research to find clues that relate to an image in hand. Not everything I’ve found is relevant to the image, but it’s a good idea to accumulate as much information as possible.

16-year-old Helmuth Voigt/Voight, born 13 October 1865 in Meisenbach, Rudolstadt, left Bremen, Germany aboard the General Werder which departed Bremen, Germany, and arrived in New York on 19 June 1882.[i]

From 1882 until 1889, there is a gap in Helmuth’s story. In 1889, he’s living in Waterbury, Connecticut, and is naturalized on January 14 of that year. While he claimed to live in Waterbury, only a Michael Voigt/Vogt appears in the city directories for 1886 to 1889. Although Helmut did live there in 1907 and 1908. Of course, it’s possible for Michael to be a relative of his, but there is no proof of that at this point. [ii]

Helmuth’s next stop is San Francisco where he states his occupation in voter registration rolls as a waiter in 1890 and a steward in 1892. In 1893 he marries an English immigrant, Jennie Thomas in Santa Clara.  It’s the first marriage for both. [iii]

According to his 1897 passport application, Helmuth Voigt, a resident of Brooklyn, stated that he wanted to return to Germany for three months, but instead didn’t return until early September 1898. It doesn’t appear that a wife traveled with him.[iv]

For photo identification purposes, the passport included physical details. He stood 5 ft 6 ¾ inches had a high forehead, gray eyes, and a prominent nose. He had a fair complexion, oblong face, and light-colored hair.  This description will be handy for sorting through the men in the group portrait.[v] 

Searching the Census

With a known relationship of father and son in the caption, it was time for a census search.  Helmut and Edmund appear together in 1910, 1920, and 1930 census for Schenectady, New York. 

Edmund was born in 1910 and he had a sister Lillian four years older. Sometimes enumerators add a bit more information. For marriages on this page, she put a superscript 2 or 1 next to the M for married.  It’s the second marriage for both Helmuth and his Scottish immigrant bride of two years.  While Minnie is Edmund’s mother, Lillian is not Minnie’s child, her mother’s nationality was given as German (likely a mistake), and a place of birth of Connecticut.  Further searching identified Minnie as Mary Boyd.  Perhaps Lillian was born to Jennie and Helmuth, but so far, no birth records or death records fill in that blank.[vi]

Enumerators collected information from who they could and that lead to discrepancies. The 1920 census asks year of immigration and naturalization which for Helmuth the enumerator wrote 1890 and 1895. It’s definitely worth looking at each census to study all the columns. Ten years later Helmuth’s immigration date in the census was 1880 when in fact he arrived in 1882. It’s important to verify the data given in a census record. [vii]

Dating the Image

Notice that I had a gap in the timeline between 1898 when Helmut returns from Germany and the census of 1910.  It’s an interesting coincidence. You’ll see why.

There are plentiful clothing clues in this image from what infants wore to older women. It’s a broad spectrum of fashion in a particular time period. Always look for the most fashionable woman in a picture. Babies can wear hand-me-downs and older folks may don their best but outdated outfit for a portrait. The small straw sailor hat was worn by the woman on the left and the hair ornament sticking up the hair of the oldest woman help date the image to circa 1899-1900. This image fits neatly into the timeline, exactly where there is a gap. The missing information includes a lack of a census record for Helmuth.

In 1900, Helmuth would be 35.

Let’s take another look at the photo. In it, there are clusters of people. They are likely posed in family groups.

 On the left, it’s a young woman, an older middle-aged/older woman, and standing behind them is a man who could be in his thirties. 

The cluster in the middle consists of a seated man in his probable 40s flanked by two boys likely less than 10. Behind stands a man about the same age in a chef cap. Both men have dark hair and eyes.  They bear a resemblance to each other and to the woman with the sailor cap.

On the far right are two twenty/thirty-something women (one with a baby) and a man possibly thirty-something. He has lighter hair and eyes.  Since Helmut’s passport application identified him as having a prominent nose, high forehead, light hair, and grey eyes it’s clear that’s why Edmund suggested it was his father.

Edmund pointed him out to be his father with the exception of the mouth. Lillian didn’t support his identification. If it isn’t Edmund then who is it and why did Edmund mistake the man for his father? At the time of his birth, Helmuth was 45. Perhaps his appearance had changed significantly since the photo.

I spot some family resemblances in the men, especially the men with mustaches. They could be brothers. The woman in the tiny hat could be their sister and the older woman their mother. The light hair and eyes on “Helmuth” make him stand out. It’s just another puzzle in this picture for which I don’t have evidence.

Food and Family

It could be a family photo celebrating a significant event. For instance, in 1897, there was an Emil Vogt who operated a restaurant at the Park Circle Hotel, opposite the entrance to Prospect Park as a “competent caterer.”  It’s possible the food business ran in the family. Edmund later becomes a baker. Helmut always claimed to be a waiter. [viii]

Helmuth Voigt died in Schenectady in 1936, where he’d lived for 28 years.  His obit mentioned him being a waiter for 27 years, a fact that is confirmed through city directories and census research. In the 1907 city directory for Waterbury, Connecticut Helmuth worked at The Elton, a luxury hotel still in operation. It’s the only mention of an exact place of employment for him. There is no mention in city directories of him being associated as an owner of a series of businesses. As for Helmuth being a failure, there is a discrepancy. At the time of the 1930 census, he owned a house worth four thousand dollars in Schenectady, New York (and a radio).[ix]

 There are so many missing details. When I look at this photo, I see the groups as possibly representing branches of a family. There could be other Voigts living in the area or perhaps they aren’t Voigt’s. Helmut lived at various times in Brooklyn, northern California, Schenectady, and Waterbury/Hartford Connecticut. When he died there remained a connection to Brooklyn.

According to a front-page article in the Times Union newspaper of Schenectady at the time of Helmuth’s death, “a rush message was sent to Brooklyn.” Two phonograph records were then sent back to Schenectady. They contained funeral music and burial service in lieu of a clergy person. There were German organizations in Brooklyn and it’s possible Helmuth maintained connections with one of them. The newspaper doesn’t state whether the recordings were in English or German.[x]

Edmund lived with his mother for the rest of her life and never married.  When she died in 1960, her obituary mentioned another child, Mrs. John George Schilke of Bristol, Connecticut who was Lillian. Searching for information on Lillian turned up an obituary for her husband where his wife is Lillian Frances Ehle, a curious find. Perhaps Lillian’s mother was actually German and didn’t carry the Voight name. It’s possible but unlikely that Lillian had an earlier marriage unless she married in her teens. Minnie’s survivors included her two children, three grandchildren, and nine great-grandchildren.[xi]  

How the photograph ended up in a Pawtucket, Rhode Island antique shop is a mystery.

Remaining questions.

There are still so many unanswered questions about this image from how it came to be in the Voigt family to who’s in it. It seems possible that Lillian and Edmund would have met other Voigt relations, but perhaps not.  Lillian is adamant in the caption that it is not their father. It’s possible that Lillian was mistaken and the man with the right height and coloring was her father and one of the women is her mother. Or one of the women is Jennie.  If that’s the case, there is yet another mystery. 

I’m looking for:

• When and where did Helmut marry Minnie/Mary Boyd? Could there be another marriage?
• What happened to his first wife Jennie? And were there any children?
• Evidence of businesses in which Helmut was involved
• Why is Lillian stating her maiden name as Ehle?
• Why isn’t Helmuth in the 1900 U.S. census?

I’m convinced this is a solvable photo problem. With 12 descendants living as of 1960, work could be done to contact them to see if anyone has a photo of Helmut.  It’s slow going to contact living descendants even when you discover the names of Lillian’s three children. Fingers crossed.

Endnotes

[i]  Year: 1882; Arrival: New York, New York, USA; Microfilm Serial: M237, 1820-1897; Line 44; List Number:836. Ancestry.com. U.S., Passport Applications, 1795-1925 [database on-line]. Lehi, UT, USA: Ancestry.com Operations, Inc., 2007; Roll #484; Volume # Roll 484-01 Apr 1897-16 Apr 1897, Passport number 1530 dated April 13, 1897.

[ii] Ancestry.com. U.S. Naturalization Record Indexes, 1791-1992 (Indexed in World Archives Project) [database on-line]. Provo, UT, USA: Ancestry.com Operations, Inc., 2010. This collection was indexed by Ancestry World Archives Project. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA); Washington, D.C.; Index to New England Naturalization Petitions, 1791-1906 (M1299); Microfilm Serial: M1299; Microfilm Roll: 36; MyHeritage.com, U.S. City Directories, Waterbury, Connecticut 1886-1889, 1906-1907.

[iii] Ancestry.com. California, U.S., Voter Registrations, 1900-1968 [database on-line]. Provo, UT, USA: Ancestry.com Operations Inc, 2017. California Marriages, 1850-1945. Database. FamilySearch.org: 6 January 2021.

[iv] Ancestry.com, U.S. Passport Applications, 1897; List or Manifest of Alien Immigrants. Helmuth Voight. 1898. https://heritage.statueofliberty.org/passenger-details/czoxMjoiNjAyOTA1MDgwMTAwIjs=/czo4OiJtYW5pZmVzdCI7  

[v] Ancestry.com, U.S. Passport Applications, 1897.

[vi] Ancestry.com. 1910 United States Federal Census [database on-line]. Lehi, UT, USA: Ancestry.com Operations Inc, 2006. Year: 1910; Census Place: Schenectady Ward 7, Schenectady, New York; Roll: T624_1078; Page: 6B; Enumeration District: 0199; FHL microfilm: 1375091; Ancestry.com. U.S., Social Security Applications and Claims Index, 1936-2007 [database on-line]. Provo, UT, USA: Ancestry.com Operations, Inc., 2015. Original data: Social Security Applications and Claims, 1936-2007, Edmund Voight. ; MyHeritage.com, New York Newspapers, 1806-2007, Obituary. Mary Elizabeth Voight. Schenectady Gazette, June 11, 1960.

[vii] Ancestry.com, 1910 United States Federal Census; Ancestry.com. 1920 United States Federal Census [database on-line]. Provo, UT, USA: Ancestry.com Operations, Inc., 2010. Images reproduced by FamilySearch. Year: 1920; Census Place: Schenectady Ward 13, Schenectady, New York; Roll: T625_1263; Page: 8A; Enumeration District: 192

[viii] Newspapers.com, advertisement. Park Circle Hotel. July 4, 1897.  Brooklyn Daily Eagle

[ix] Newspapers.com, notice. “Phonograph Record Provides Funeral Service,” Times Union (Schenectady, New York), March 13, 1936, 1.  U.S. City Directories, Waterbury, Connecticut 1907; “United States Census, 1930,” database with images, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:X4T5-JZ7 : accessed 15 July 2021), Edmund W Voigt in household of Helmuth Voigt, Rotterdam, Schenectady, New York, United States; citing enumeration district (ED) ED 17, sheet 22B, line 56, family 485, NARA microfilm publication T626 (Washington D.C.: National Archives and Records Administration, 2002), roll 1644; FHL microfilm 2,341,378.

[x] Newspapers.com, notice. “Phonograph Record Provides Funeral Service,” Times Union (Schenectady, New York), March 13, 1936, 1.

[xi] MyHeritage.com, Obituary for Mary Voight. Schenectady Gazette, June 11, 1960. Ancestry.com, “Obituary of J. George Schilke,” Hartford Courant, May 2, 1965.

The post A Photo Mystery and a Family Argument appeared first on Maureen Taylor.